Blog

NIMG (Not In My Garden)

statue in filipendula

Here’s my contribution to blackswampgirl’s (aka Kim) Not In My Garden meme over at A Study in Contrasts. Long-time visitors (both of you) might recognize that the above image is a PhotoShopped combo from two earlier posts, Pink Filipendula and Honey, does this peplos make my butt look fat? The image came to mind as I thought about Kim’s meme. And I realized that I could make it even with my modest imaging skills. Hopefully it will relate to the text.

What you won’t find in my garden:

Formal design. No straight lines here, or proper spacing between plants. I love visiting a great formal garden because I can’t do it myself without a team of OCD hired help. It would drive me mad because I’d notice every plant out of line and every weed between the plants.

tacky statuesReal garden statuary. Not that I don’t like it. Just my taste exceeds my means. I would love to put real, classic garden statuary in wilder spots of the garden. Such ornament would give it that kind of ‘nature taking over’ look. Just can’t afford it. If anyone wants to donate a real Venus Kallipygos or the southeast Asian statues that Nicole shot at Chiang Mai (and more Budha park) or any of the Laotian art she shot, I’ll give them a proper home. You donate, I’ll pay the shipping. Hurry, or I may resort to tacky modern imitations (right).

Stylish garden wear. Sloggers make great hanging planters. But when I garden, I don’t want to look good or worry about getting something dirty or ripped. That includes footwear.

Deer candy. Well actually I’ve got quite a few tulips and hostas. But I either moved them from our old place or came by them for free. With our deer pressure, I won’t spend any more money on ornamentals deer like. The more poisonous the plant, the more I like it.

Weed-free lawn. I would love a putting green or croquet court. I love the look of athletic turf. But don’t have the time or the energy. I’ve invited our turf guy to bring his class to my place to do turf weed identification, because I’ve got them all. I just run the rotary mulch harvester through it every week or so and put a little nitrogen on it most falls.

Enuf for now. I’m sure I’ll think of more this weekend. Stop back.

Update for Kim. Better?

statue_grass.jpg

Nanci Griffith, State Theater, Ithaca, 9/11

It’ll be the third time Elly and I have seen Nanci: Allentown, Pa., circa 1984 and Minneapolis, Minn., circa 1988 being the other two. (Opening act in the Twin Cities was a young James McMurtry backed by a much older David Bromberg.) Way too long since we’ve seen her and way too many YouTubes to choose from.

I’m goin’ back where my garden blooms all year
Where the wintertime speaks softly in the fallin’ rain
I’m goin’ back to my green eyed lover there
and we will dance along the banks of old Lake Pontchartrain

Update: With this song going through my head the last couple days, I finally realized it’s allure: It may be the last of the great train songs. Who writes train songs any more? The rumble and roar, whistles and whine? Great expectations of where the tracks would take you? Beats the hell out of even my favorite car songs (Rocket 88.)Across the Great Divide:

It’s a Hard Life:

Speed of the Sound of Loneliness

Old aerial photos

Cornell’s Institute for Resource Information Sciences has a website with digitized images of aerial photographs for four central New York counties dating back as far as 1936.

While the images are mere gray smudges compared with the local.live.com aerials I blogged about earlier. (Example below.)

While I can discern a few intersting facts about our house from these old aerials, the most astonishing thing you notice navigating through the aerials to find and zoom in on this spot is how much of the land that was open pasture or cropland is now overgrown. It’s no wonder we have so many more deer now than then.

Spring 2006 local.live.com view. (All images, top is north.)

live.com aerial

1991: The row of Norway spruce to the west of the house and church across the street make it easy to get oriented. But there are other trees along the road — including a very large one northwest of the house — that weren’t there when we moved in in 1999.

1991 aerial photo

1980: The home east of the church isn’t hasn’t yet been built. The Norway spruce haven’t been planted. Looking at the old outbuilding south of our house, it appears there’s a wide concrete apron around the south and east sides and a rectangular enclosure south of that.

1980 aerial photo

1964: This shot looks like it was captured out of the corner of the fisheye lens on the plane, looking east. And unlike the other pictures, it’s taken during the growing season. You can see the Norway maple south of the house is already large. The outbuilding south of the house looks much larger than the modest shed that remains on that location, and there looks to be a smaller shed southwest of that. Notable how many trees there are between the open area west of the house and the wetland farther west. And how many trees there aren’t to the south and southeast — although it looks like scattered trees are already starting to move in to what looks like it may have been pasture. I had thought that area may have been orchard because you can find occasional apple trees scattered through the woods in that area.

1964 aerial photo

1954: OK. Now we’re back literally before my time. Even with no leaves on the trees, there are more distinct edges between field and forest — a good sign that this area was being managed for pasture or hay. What I can’t figure is how it looks like they worked across the stream and wetland south of the outbuilding. I surmise that the wetland had a lower waterlevel half a century ago.

1954 aerial photo

1934: Hmmm… This is the middle of the Republican Great Depression. Is that big rectangle between the house and outbuilding a vegetable garden? It looks like there is a well-warn path from the outbuiding south to what looks like a fenced-in pasture. Maybe that outbuilding is a stable and the open area a horse pasture? There was still a lot of animal power used in 1934.

1934 aerial photo

Would love to see earlier aerials. But I think taking pictures from planes in ’34 was pretty cutting-edge technology. I don’t know of any earlier images of the property, either. May have to visit the History Center in town sometime soon.

Original maps:

1938
1954
1964
1980
1991