12 thoughts on “June bloom day scans”

  1. These are just beautiful images! I love the dramatic lighting and the full, rich color of the blooms. I keep going back and forth on digital photography. I have an old, beloved Nikon FE2 and occasionally scan but use a Canon Elph for my blog. I’m planning to get a digital SLR this summer as I think the technology is just about there.

  2. Les:

    Scans have one big advantage: You can’t see all the weeds.

    Sarah:

    These scans are made on a cheap hand-me-down scanner. I do fiddle with them a little in PhotoShop. I used to just adjust levels. But last month Lori over at Gardener of Good and Evil taught me a new PhotoShop trick that drives this scan from antique-looking to something much closer to the actual colors of the flowers. (Long story short: Duplicate layer, multiply. Though more often now I use duplicate layer and hard light to get closer match with reality.)

    Most of the images you see on this blog were shot with Canon Digital Rebel. I still don’t know what all the buttons do, but I can take passable images with it.

  3. Love the scans! Especially the first one, and the one with the euphorbia (I think?) In the first scan, what is the white-flowering plant coming in from the left hand side middle? (Just under what I think is begonia flowers, and next to the peony.) That looks like it ought to be fragrant as all get-out for some reason.

  4. Kim: That’s Persicaria polymorpha, if memory serves. Makes a nice drift, but not really great as a specimen plant, in my mind. Blooms all summer, but not fragrant, at least not to me.

Comments are closed.