In reply to Organic Lawns – More Tipping Point News?

Fred

This is a rather long reply to Susan Harris’s post over at Garden Rant this morning.

First Susan, no one has ever accused me of being a ‘horticultural expert’. I’m a gardener and communications guy who has the good fortune of working with some great plant people at my day job. When I blog, I’m just an avid gardener like the rest of you, so I won’t presume to speak for my co-worker “Frank S. Rossi, a turf specialist at Cornell University and a nationally recognized expert on golf course maintenance, [who] does not share [SafeLawn’s founder] Mr. Tukey’s enthusiasm,” as Leslie Land writes in the NY Times. (You can read the full article until it disappears behind the NY Times for-pay firewall.)

I think that Frank does share Paul’s enthusiasm for helping lawnowners make sure their lawns are environmental assets, not liabilities, and making sure that they’re not using products that they don’t need. Frank is the author of Lawn Care Without Pesticides, which is available online.

I share that enthusiasm, too. I’m not a lawn freak. But Fred the Dalmatian loves the lawn, and Jade (the lab-border collie mix up in my banner pic) loves to roll in the grass. I would never apply anything to my lawn that would hurt them. But my lawn doesn’t qualify as organic, because most falls I apply about a pound of nitrogen (as urea) to part of my lawn, focusing on the weak spots. (More about that toward the end.)

Where Frank and Paul part ways, I think, is on the efficacy of compost teas. The Times’ article says “Dr. Rossi’s research lab has evaluated compost tea’s effect on turf and found little proof of a major benefit.” I think that’s accurate reporting.

My understanding of compost teas is that they are supposed to act as ‘microbial inoculants’ to kind of jump start soil biological processes. I believe those processes are important. But for teas to show benefits, first you have to have soil where the processes are out of whack. If your soil is healthy, I’m not sure why you’d expect a lot of benefit.

You throw in all the other variables – the origin of the compost needed to make the tea, what microbes are present in that compost, how the tea is ‘brewed’, the type of soil it’s applied to, the time of the year, etc. etc. – and I think that it’s very difficult to make the blanket statement that compost tea works. Paul is quoted as saying that “ … it’s like a blood transfusion for the lawn.” It’s a nice analogy, but not all health issues are solved by a blood transfusion.

I personally have a concern about organic fertilizers from a phosphate pollution perspective. If you soil test most mature sods, the phosphorus levels are often high (or at least sufficient) – particularly if they’ve been fertilized during establishment. (This may not be true for all soils, particularly sandy ones. Take a soil test if you aren’t sure.).

While there’s no doubt in my mind that the organic matter in most organic fertilizers and composts benefit grass in most cases, especially on disturbed soils and soils low in organic matter, most of those fertilizers are also high in phosphorus. That phosphorus has the potential to run off and pollute surface waters. (Some of us are old enough to remember the days when detergent manufacturers removed phosphates from their products because they were killing aquatic ecosystems.)

Grass needs nitrogen to grow. In healthy, mature sods, you may get enough just by leaving the clippings to recycle N. Or you could plant clover to fix nitrogen for your lawn. But if you plan to apply organic fertilizers that are high in phosphorus on a regular basis to feed nitrogen to the grass, you are going to risk phosphate runoff.

For those of you in the Chesapeake Bay watershed (or any other watershed with a lot of animal agriculture), livestock farmers face a similar problem. If they apply enough manure to meet the nitrogen needs of their corn, they overapply phosphorus. Over the years, soil test P levels go up, and any soil that erodes carries that phosphorus into the bay.

When friends and neighbors ask me about lawn care, I really don’t focus in on what to apply when. I think you get a much larger bang for your effort by concentrating on mowing management and some other lawn basics:

  • Mow high – Set your push mower at the highest setting or your riding mower so that you are cutting the grass at 3 or 4 inches.
  • Leave the clippings – To recycle nutrients.
  • Keep your mower blade sharp – So you don’t stress the grass.
  • Don’t grow grass – Where it doesn’t want to grow. Hardscape high-traffic areas. Plant shade-loving plants where there isn’t enough light. Plant a rain garden in poorly drained areas.

Like gardening and politics, all lawn care is local. I write from a Northeast perspective. Your mileage may vary, particularly if you are in a different neck of the woods.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

10 thoughts on “In reply to Organic Lawns – More Tipping Point News?

  1. Lawn care quiz: Click on the picture of Fred the Dalmatian. Look closely and tell me which of the bullet points above I wasn’t practicing at the time of this picture.

  2. Well-written, balanced. Thank you. I think your four bulleted tips apply to most locations where lawns are kept. I know they apply here in Central Indiana.

  3. Carol: The ‘mowing high’ part might be even more important out there. Longer grass encourages deeper roots, and I think you all are more likely to have heat and water stress in summer out your way.

  4. You’re a winner Hank. My old lawn mower (ran for 15 years before the body cracked) had a blade that was impossible to remove and difficult to sharpen while mounted on the machine.

    If I had swag, it would be in the mail. Maybe I’ll mail you some Digitalis ferruginea seed.

    What Fred has in looks he makes up for by being not so smart. Jade is the brains of the team.

  5. Great post… and I’ll echo Hank’s compliment that Fred is “one damned handsome animal.”

    I’m with you on keeping a little grass for the animals. Coco likes to sleep on cool or warm cement (depending on the season and time of day) generally, but she likes her grass, too. And I admit that the carpet of green does set off some of the plantings quite nicely, too… even when it’s brown in the summer because I refuse to water it.

  6. Very nice article – thank you. Here in Minnesota, a new law was passed two years ago that severely restricts the use of phosphorus in lawn fertilizer. Essentially, the application of phosphorus is banned on established lawns. It’s application is only allowed when establishing a new lawn, by “trained” people at golf courses, and in a few very restricted areas of the state (based on the soil composition in those locations). Because Minnesota is the Land of 10,000 Lakes, the issue of water quality is very important to a lot of residents. To read more, go to http://www.extension.umn.edu/extensionnews/2005/phorphoruslaw.html. Although I don’t think the law goes as far as it could, at least it’s a start.

  7. Great post with reasonable info. It is important to remember that ‘organics’ is now big business. Americans have a love affair with their lawns and they are here to stay but hopefully with a few dandelions (good stewed) and a bit of clover! Thanks!

  8. I know this post is ages old but I followed from your “most popular” link and just had to say thank you. Too often when people get tangled in the party line they lose sight of the bigger picture; in this case the fact that excess phosphorus affects the water supply no matter if the source is organic or not. I appreciate the reminder to keep thinking critically.

Comments are closed.